While doing more research on badges this afternoon, I stumbled upon this article on The Chronicle of Higher Education called “A Future Full of Badges.” The author is discussing the new methods of credentialing that are becoming available, and he introduces badges as a potential way around traditional educational structures. I really like how he explains the link between credentials and traditional degrees, as well as the potential badges pose to get around these more restrictive structures. The author states that:
“Instead, the value of the traditional degree comes mostly from the presumed general authority of the granting institution—and the fact that traditional colleges have a legally enforced near-monopoly over the production of credentials that are widely accepted for the purposes of getting a job or pursuing advanced education. ‘
‘Open systems tend to blow such lucrative arrangements apart. The doomed effort of for-profit academic publishers to maintain their grip on prestigious scholarly journals is one example. The imminent demise of the physical textbook market is another. Open badges won't be controlled by incumbent institutions with a vested financial interest in limiting the supply of valuable credentials.’
‘When that happens, it will create hardship for traditional institutions that now use the revenue generated from their undergraduate-credential franchise to subsidize the cost of graduate education, administration, scholarship, and other activities. But society as a whole will benefit enormously. The store of human capital will be more broadly and accurately represented by credentials that are useful in a mobile, interconnected world. Separating the credentialing and teaching functions of higher education allows organizations to specialize in one or the other.”
While this does touch upon many ideas I’ve already mentioned, I think this is a very good way to describe the future of badges, especially through a separation of teaching and credentialing. This does lead to one of the main questions I’ve heard about the authority represented by badges and how these can have the same weight as an academic degree. While we’re obviously not there yet, I think it’s vital to separate the skills and ideas that are learned within a degree from the actual piece of paper. Badges allow anyone to demonstrate their knowledge through clear criteria, and open access to the requirements and even work, so that it is not just those with a degree that can demonstrate that yes they’ve learned how to do skill x. Instead anyone, anywhere can learn these skills from real experts (whether they have a degree or not), and as long as there is clear documentation of how and where this work was done, badges provide the necessary proof to solidify these skills into something marketable.
While this does lead to potential problems regarding this openness, especially as anyone anywhere can create their own courses, I think this is also the key factor that makes everything work. Through this openness there must be equally open means of verifying authenticity and the depth of the course offered, and this then means that authority can exist anywhere as long as this openness is also there.
I love how you say "anyone anywhere" can learn how to use these badges. I love how it can be a global effort and not just a nationwide effort. I know that there are some third world countries that have set up the Internet (typically the slowest form of dial-up . . . remember that?) in their communities to form connections with the world. Can you imagine what things could happen in those countries once technology becomes more present and badges become a great source of education?! So many great things could happen!
ReplyDeletehoo boy. nothing like throwing down the gauntlet against the evil authorities. you're pretty much challenging the power of many of our higher institutions here. it's a little bit like saying, and someday we'll have no need for the church and we can meet in our homes. I think you need to be realistic about how much resistance and inertia there is dismantling centralized authorities.
ReplyDeleteyour line of thinking here is interesting in theory, harder in practice
I think what needs to be balanced in your analysis is the concept of "laying on of hands" and "unbroken succession". Part of the reason that teaching and credentialing cannot be entirely separated is that some information and tradition and institutional memories can only be transferred by physical presence under controlled (consecretated) conditions. This means that there needs to be a certain "atomicity" (all at one ness) between the taking of the student under teaching authority, teaching them directly, and then issuing them the degree. You can't just beam in or walk into the top of the temple, so to speak.
three examples of situations where your thinking is in use today are:
o boy scouts - a boy can learn knot tying in one town, then go to another and meet with the merit badge counselor in another town; also badges are more easily added and removed over the years
o microsoft certifications - whether you learned how to configure Microsoft SQL server by book or internet or hands on, if you pass the test from a testing house you get the certification and it is recognized. [how is the knowledge represented by a Microsoft certification different from the knowledge being bestowed by a degree of higher education]
o SAT scores - a case where it doesn't matter what HS you went to, or whether you were home schooled, or even where you take the test - the teaching and the credentialing are separate. However its interesting to wonder if an SAT score is a badge or really a range of badges?
Just saw this: online courses vs State of Minnesota
ReplyDeletehttp://venturebeat.com/2012/10/19/dear-minnesota-free-online-education-is-a-good-thing-yeah-really/